微加速度计中Sigma Delta调制与 脉冲编码调制的对比分析

谭晓昀; 周贤中; 姜一鸣; 陈伟平

doi:null

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

微加速度计中Sigma Delta调制与脉冲编码调制的对比分析

论文 | 更新时间：2020-08-12

- 微加速度计中Sigma Delta调制与脉冲编码调制的对比分析
- Comparative analysis of Sigma Delta modulation and pulse code modulation in micro-accelerometer
- 光学精密工程 2009年17卷第6期页码：1228-1232
- 作者机构：
  
  哈尔滨工业大学 MEMS中心,黑龙江哈尔滨150001
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：
  中图分类号： TH824.4
- 收稿日期：2009-01-20，
  
  修回日期：2009-04-30，
  
  网络出版日期：2009-06-20，
  
  纸质出版日期：2009-06-20
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
谭晓昀,周贤中,姜一鸣,陈伟平. 微加速度计中Sigma Delta调制与脉冲编码调制的对比分析[J]. 光学精密工程, 2009,17(6):1228-1232

TAN Xiao-yun, ZHOU Xian-zhong, JIANG Yi-ming, et al. Comparative analysis of Sigma Delta modulation and pulse code modulation in micro-accelerometer[J]. Optics and precision engineering, 2009, 17(6): 1228-1232.
谭晓昀,周贤中,姜一鸣,陈伟平. 微加速度计中Sigma Delta调制与脉冲编码调制的对比分析[J]. 光学精密工程, 2009,17(6):1228-1232 DOI：

TAN Xiao-yun, ZHOU Xian-zhong, JIANG Yi-ming, et al. Comparative analysis of Sigma Delta modulation and pulse code modulation in micro-accelerometer[J]. Optics and precision engineering, 2009, 17(6): 1228-1232. DOI：

摘要

对Sigma Delta调制与脉冲编码调制进行对比

研究了Sigma Delta调制与脉冲编码调制的优缺点。建立了微加速度计中两位输出的Sigma Delta调制和两位输出的脉冲编码调制的仿真系统。然后

对比使用这两种调制方式的微加速度计的加速度信号

并分析在两种不同调制方式下的输出信号波形的差别。最后

利用周期图法得到了两种调制信号的功率谱密度图

发现在低频段脉冲编码调制信号的量化噪声比Sigma Delta调制信号大很多;而在高频段

两种调制方式信号的量化噪声一样严重。仿真结果表明

尽管Sigma Delta调制系统比脉冲编码调制系统更加复杂

但是Sigma Delta调制得到的信噪比要比脉冲编码调制得到的信噪比高出20 dB。

Abstract

A comparative study of the Sigma Delta Modulation(SDM) and the Pulse Code Modulation(PCM) is presented

and the advantages and the disadvantages of the two kinds of modulation are also obtained. A 2-bit SDM simulated system and a 2-bit (PCM) simulated system for a micro-accelerometer are established in this paper. Then

the accelaration signals pass through the modulations are comparatively analyzed

and the difference of two mudulations output waves is obtained by the comparive analysis. Finally

the power spectral density patterns of two kinds of the modulated signals are computed with a periodogram respectively. The power spectral density from experimental results indicates that the quantization noise of the PCM is more serious than that of the SDM in the low frequency

but the quantization noises of both modulation methods are the same in the high frequency. The simulated results show that the SNR of the SDM is 20 dB higher than that of the PCM

though the SDM modulation system is more complex than the PCM.

关键词

Keywords

references

浏览量

383

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

时钟抖动下加速度测量值的数值双积分误差