浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1. 国家自然科学基金委员会, 北京 100083
2. 中国科学院长春先学精密饥械研充所, 长春 130022
Received:05 September 1993,
Published Online:15 August 1993,
Published:15 August 1993
移动端阅览
王玉堂, 付便翔, 李士范. 同行评议中同行专家的选择与评审专家数据库系统[J]. 光学精密工程, 1993,1(4): 51-57
Wang Yutang, Fu Bianxiang, Li Shifan. Scientist Database[J]. Editorial Office of Optics and Precision Engineering, 1993,1(4): 51-57
王玉堂, 付便翔, 李士范. 同行评议中同行专家的选择与评审专家数据库系统[J]. 光学精密工程, 1993,1(4): 51-57 DOI:
Wang Yutang, Fu Bianxiang, Li Shifan. Scientist Database[J]. Editorial Office of Optics and Precision Engineering, 1993,1(4): 51-57 DOI:
同行评议已成为当令世界各国在科研课题立项
进展情况检查
成果评价等方面普遍采用的有效方法。本文介绍了同行评议中同行专家的选择。同行评议意见的形成和评审专家数据库系统的建立。讨论了数据库系统中专家分布。专家数据的验证、检索入口的设置、系统管理与运行等间题。
The peer review has become a most effective method in selecting research topics
checking progress in research and assessing achievements in scientifie research. This paper briefly dircribes the scientist database for this purpose
and related problems for instance
Distribution of scientists
processing of the data
management ancf operation of the systems and so on.Finally
it suggests proposals about improving the system.
0
Views
433
下载量
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution