WANG Yaodong,XU Jinyang,ZHU Liqiang,et al.Line feature coplanar constraint calibration method for lidar point cloud of tunnel contour[J].Optics and Precision Engineering,2024,32(06):774-784.
WANG Yaodong,XU Jinyang,ZHU Liqiang,et al.Line feature coplanar constraint calibration method for lidar point cloud of tunnel contour[J].Optics and Precision Engineering,2024,32(06):774-784. DOI: 10.37188/OPE.20243206.0774.
Line feature coplanar constraint calibration method for lidar point cloud of tunnel contour
In the measurement of subway tunnel profile parameters, it is necessary to calibrate the high-speed Lidar point cloud with high precision. In particular, the tunnel environment in large scenes has high requirements for calibration templates, complicated calibration process, and great influence on detection accuracy. To solve this problem, a novel calibration method for subway tunnel contour point cloud was proposed in this paper, and the algorithm was studied based on dual lidar measurement system. In this method, a special manual portable calibration system was designed. The objective function was established by using the calibration plate line features extracted from point cloud data, and the global optimal solution was found through the nonlinear optimization method combining genetic algorithm and Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm to realize the calibration of lidar. The experimental results show that the calibration error of the top rail is within ±1.5 mm. Static measurement accuracy
X
error within ±1 mm,
Y
error within ±4 mm; When the acquisition system performs data acquisition at a speed of 5 km/h, the dynamic measurement accuracy
X
error is within ±4 mm and
Y
error is within ±6 mm. This method can realize the high-precision calibration of lidar, the algorithm is robust, easy to operate, and has the characteristics of strong environmental adaptability.
ZONG W P, LI G Y, LI M L, et al. A survey of laser scan matching methods[J]. Chinese Optics, 2018, 11(6): 914-930.(in Chinese). doi: 10.3788/co.20181106.0914http://dx.doi.org/10.3788/co.20181106.0914
YAO L B, ZHANG S H, WANG Z X. Dynamic calibration of vehicle laser scanning system[J]. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 2019, 44(8): 75-81.(in Chinese). doi: 10.16251/j.cnki.1009-2307.2019.08.011http://dx.doi.org/10.16251/j.cnki.1009-2307.2019.08.011
LI L, YAN J, RUAN Y T. Calibration of vehicle-borne laser mapping system[J]. Chinese Optics, 2013, 6(3): 353-358.(in Chinese). doi: 10.3788/co.20130603.0353http://dx.doi.org/10.3788/co.20130603.0353
YU Z J, YANG Y N, ZHU L Q. Study on calibration method for 3-D laser scanning systems[J]. Journal of Electronic Measurement and Instrument, 2007, 21(6): 31-35.(in Chinese)
CHEN P X, SHI W Z, BAO S, et al. Low-drift odometry, mapping and ground segmentation using a backpack LiDAR system[J]. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2021, 6(4): 7285-7292. doi: 10.1109/lra.2021.3097060http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/lra.2021.3097060
ANTONE M, FRIEDMAN Y. Fully automated laser range calibration[C]. Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2007. Warwick. British Machine Vision Association, 2007: 1-10. doi: 10.5244/c.21.66http://dx.doi.org/10.5244/c.21.66
ZHOU Y, LÜ C, HOU F J, et al. Data fusion method of multi roadside LiDAR based on coordinate transformation[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Engineering Science), 2022, 52(6): 41-49.(in Chinese)
张倩. 三维激光扫描测量系统标定算法研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2015.
ZHANG Q. Study on Calibration Algorithm for 3-D Laser Scanning System[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2015. (in Chinese)
LI H S, LUO X N, DENG C G, et al. Joint calibration of sports camera and lidar based on LM algorithm[J]. Journal of Guilin University of Electronic Technology, 2022, 42(5): 345-353.(in Chinese)
LAN Q L, ZOU J G, YANG D L. Point cloud registration based on hybrid optimization algorithm[J]. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 2022, 47(7): 119-125.(in Chinese)
ZHANG J Y, CHEN B B, YANG Y X, et al. Positioning algorithm for laser spot center based on BP neural network and genetic algorithm[J]. Chinese Optics, 2023, 16(2): 407-414.(in Chinese). doi: 10.37188/co.2022-0084http://dx.doi.org/10.37188/co.2022-0084
LI D Y, QIN F J, HUANG C F, et al. Inertial navigation autonomous damping algorithm based on LM algorithm[J]. Transducer and Microsystem Technologies, 2023, 42(6): 112-115.(in Chinese)
YANG G C, WANG Q, YU B G, et al. High-precision indoor positioning based on robust LM visual inertial odometer and pseudosatellite[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2022, 51(1): 18-30.(in Chinese). doi: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2022.20200251http://dx.doi.org/10.11947/j.AGCS.2022.20200251
WAN C. A hybrid genetic LM algorithm for solving nonlinear least squares problems[J]. Changjiang Information & Communications, 2021, 34(12): 52-54.(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1131.2021.12.016http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-1131.2021.12.016
TANG H W, XIE W P, CUI Y, et al. Hybrid algorithm for aero-engine model solving based on Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2023, 38(2): 371-381.(in Chinese). doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20210367http://dx.doi.org/10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20210367