YAO Jun-cai, LIU Gui-zhong,. Video quality objective assessment combined contrast sensitivity characteristics of human visual system[J]. Editorial Office of Optics and Precision Engineering, 2016,24(3): 659-667
YAO Jun-cai, LIU Gui-zhong,. Video quality objective assessment combined contrast sensitivity characteristics of human visual system[J]. Editorial Office of Optics and Precision Engineering, 2016,24(3): 659-667 DOI: 10.3788/OPE.20162403.0659.
Video quality objective assessment combined contrast sensitivity characteristics of human visual system
In combination of the perceiving characteristics of human eyes for brightness
chroma
contrast and moving targets
an objective assessment method of video quality based on contrast sensitivity characteristics of a human visual system was proposed. In the method
the video was divided into spatial and time domains to be described. The features of image were extracted from four aspects
brightness
chroma
contrast
and target motion based on the perceiving characteristics of human eyes and their intensities were computed. Then
the contrast sensitivity values of human eyes were used as the weight factors of the intensity to sum and to construct the model of human eye perception content of the video. Finally
original and distorted videos respectively perceived by imitating eyes with this model
and the intensity differences of the pixels and the motion vectors between arbitrary corresponding units of two videos were computed. By taking the intensity differences as the scores of video quality objective evaluation
the objective evaluation model for video quality was constructed by them. The experiments were carried out with 6 source videos and 48 test videos proposed by LIVE database
and the 5 classic video quality evaluation models recommended by the Video Quality Expert Group(VQEG) were compared with the proposed model. The results show that the linear correlation coefficient between video quality evaluated by the proposed model and the subjective evaluation results reaches 0.8705. They have good consistency
and evaluation effects are better than those of other 5 classical models.
关键词
Keywords
references
范媛媛, 沈湘衡, 桑英军. 基于对比度敏感度的无参考图像清晰度评价[J]. 光学精密工程, 2011, 19(10):2485-2493. FAN Y Y, SHEN X H, SAN Y J. No reference image sharpness assessment based on contrast sensitivity[J]. Opt. Precision Eng., 2011, 19(10):2485-2493.(in Chinese)
宁方立, 何碧静, 韦娟. 基于l_p范数的压缩感知图像重建算法研究[J]. 物理学报, 2013, 62(17):174212. NING F L, HE B J, WEI J. An algorithm for image reconstruction based on l_p norm[J]. Acta Phys. Sin. , 2013, 62(17):174212.(in Chinese)
CHEN Y J, WU K S, ZHANG Q. From QoS to QoE:A tutorial on video quality assessment[J]. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials , 2015, 17(2):1126-1165.
KARTHIKEYAN R, SAINARAYANAN G, DEEPA S N. Perceptual video quality assessment in H. 264 video coding standard using objective modeling[J]. Springerplus, 2014, 3(1):1-6.
杨亚威, 李俊山, 张士杰, 等. 基于生物视觉标准模型特征的无参考型图像质量评价方法[J]. 液晶与显示, 2014, 29(6):1016-1023 YANG Y W, LI J S, ZHANG S J, et al. Non reference image quality assessment approach based on standard model features of biological vision[J]. Chinese Journal of Liquid Crystals and Displays, 2014, 29(6):1016-1023.(in Chinese)
米曾真. 小波域中CSF频率与方向加权的图像质量评价方法[J]. 电子学报, 2014, 42(7):1273-1276. MI Z ZH. Image quality evaluation method based on frequency and direction weighted to CSF in wavelet domain[J]. Acta Electronic Sinica, 2014, 42(7):1273-1276.(in Chinese)
LI C F, BOVIK A C. Content-weighted video quality assessment using a three-component image model[J]. Journal of Electronic Imaging, 2010, 19(1):143-153.
邱聚能, 李辉, 闫乐乐, 等. 基于图像质量评价的LCD运动模糊检测方法[J]. 液晶与显示, 2015, 30(3):531-537 QIU J N, LI H, YAN L L, et al.. LCD motion blur detecting method based on image quality assessment[J]. Chinese Journal of Liquid Crystals and Displays, 2015, 30(3):531-537.(in Chinese)
OU Y F, XUE Y Y, WANG Y. Q-STAR_A perceptual video quality model considering impact of spatial, temporal, and amplitude resolution[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2014, 23(6):2473-2486.
WANG Z, BOVIK A C, SHEIKH H R, et al. Image quality assessment:From error visibility to structural similarity[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2004, 13(4):600-612.
AKAMINE A W Y, FARIAS M C. Video quality assessment using visual attention computational models[J]. Journal of Electronic Imaging, 2014, 23(6):061107.
SOUNDARARAJAN R, BOVIK A C. Video quality assessment by reduced reference spatio-temporal entropic differencing[J]. IEEE Transactions on Circuits & Systems for Video Technology, 2013, 23(4):684-694.
MOORTHY A K, CHOI L K, BOVIK A C, et al.. Video quality assessment on mobile devices:subjective, behavioral and objective studies[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 2012, 6(6):652-671.
ANEGEKUH L, SUN L, JAMMEH E, et al.. Content-based video quality prediction for HEVC encoded videos streamed over packet networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2015, 17(8):1323-1334.
GINESU G, MASSIDDA F, GIUSTO D D. A multi-factors approach for image quality assessment based on a human visual system model[J]. Signal Processing:Image Communication, 2006, 21(4):316-333.
SESHADRINATHAN K, SOUNDARARAJAN R, BOVIK A C, et al.. LIVE Video Quality Database[DB] http://live.ece.utexas.edu/research/quality/live_mobile_video.html,[2016-04-20].
BARTEN P G J. Evaluation of subjective image quality with the square-root integral method[J]. Journal of the Optical Society of America A-Optics Image Science and Vision, 1990, 7(10):2024-2031
NADENAU M. Integration of human color vision models into high quality image compression[D]. Switzerland:cole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne. 2000.
KELLY D H. Motion and vision. Ⅱ. Stabilized spatio-temporal threshold surface[J]. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1979, 69(10):1340-1349.
ZHANG F, BULL D R. Quality assessment methods for perceptual video compression[C]. 20th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing(ICIP 2013), 2013:39-43.