Zhi-liang YU, Yan WANG, Kai-rui CAO, et al. Hysteresis compensation and composite control for Piezoelectric actuator[J]. Optics and precision engineering, 2017, 25(8): 2113-2120.
DOI:
Zhi-liang YU, Yan WANG, Kai-rui CAO, et al. Hysteresis compensation and composite control for Piezoelectric actuator[J]. Optics and precision engineering, 2017, 25(8): 2113-2120. DOI: 10.3788/OPE.20172508.2113.
Hysteresis compensation and composite control for Piezoelectric actuator
Fast Steering Mirror (FSM) is the core part in terminal fine aiming system of inter-satellite laser communication. As the driving device for FSM
Piezoelectric actuator's (PEA) hysteresis characteristics seriously affect FSM's position accuracy
and therefore have adverse influence on stability of inter-satellite communication link. In order to solve this problem
a modified Prandtl-Ishlinskii (MPI) model was proposed to describe PEA. On this basis
a feed-forward linearization approach for PEA was presented to achieve feed-forward inverse compensation for hysteresis. Meanwhile
a composite control method was developed by combining the MPI model and the incremental PID control algorithm
then the composite control algorithm was implemented in DSP later. At last
the performance of proposed algorithm was verified on test platform. The experimental results indicate that when system was input with damped sinusoidal and constant amplitude sinusoidal curves of 10 Hz and 100 Hz respectively
model error was within 0.59%. Under damped sinusoidal input curve of same frequency under 100Hz
the greatest error of traditional PID algorithm was 59.31
μ
rad
and that of proposed composite algorithm was 14.22
μ
rad. Experimental data shows that MPI model can accurately depict hysteresis characteristics of PEA and corresponding composite control method has obviously better dynamic tracking performance than traditional PID method
which can satisfy requirements of practical application to FSM.
关键词
Keywords
references
HAMID H.深空光通信[M].北京:清华大学出版社, 2009:283-296. HAMID H. Deep Space Optical Communication[M]. Beijing:Tsinghua University Press, 2009:283-296. (in Chinese)
HUANG J, ZHANGP, DENG K, et al.. Boundary parameters of adaptive optical system in satellite to ground coherent laser communication system[J]. Opt. Precision Eng., 2014, 22(5):1204-1211. (in Chinese)
GREGORY M, HEINE F, KAMPFNER H, et al.. Commercial optical inter-satellite communication at high data rates[J]. Optical Engineering, 2012, 53(3):031202.
TOYOSHINA M, ARAKI K. In-orbit measurement of short term attitude and vibrational environment on the engineering test satellite Ⅵ using laser communication equipment[J]. Optical Engineering, 2001, 40(5):827-832.
KIM I I, RILEY B, WONG N M. Lessons learned from the STRV-2 satellite-to-ground lasercom experiment[C]. Conference on Free-Space Laser Communication Technologies Ⅻ, 2001, 24-25.
ARVIZU A, SANTOS J, DOMINGUEZ E, et al.. ATP subsystem for optical communications on a cubesat[C]. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Space Optical Systems and Applications, 2015:1-5.
LI R, LI H Z, TANG Y F, et al..Compound-axis APT system in space optical communication[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2011, 40(7):1333-1336.(in Chinese)
LU N, KE X ZH, ZHANG H. Research on APT coarse tracking in free space laser communication[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2010, 39(5):943-949. (in Chinese)
QI B, CHEN H B, REN G, et al.. APT technology for 100-kilometer quantum entanglement distribution experiment[J]. Opt. Precision Eng., 2013, 21(6):1628-1634. (in Chinese)
YUAN G, ZHANG X B, WANG D H, et al.. Hysteresis and linearization of piezoelectric fast steering mirror[J]. Opt. Precision Eng., 2015, 23(6):1650-1656. (in Chinese)
WANG Y F, GUO Y X, MAO J Q. Rate-dependent modeling and tracking control of piezoelectric actuators[J]. Opt. Precision Eng., 2014, 22(3):616-625. (in Chinese)
LIU Y F, SHAN J J, QI N M. Creep modeling and identification for piezoelectric actuators based on fractional-order system[J]. Mechatronics, 2013, 23(SI):840-847.
ALJANAIDEH O, JANAIDEH M AI, RAKOTONDRABE M. Inversion-free feedforward dynamic compensation of hysteresis nonlinearities in piezoelectric micro/nano-positioning actuators[C]. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation(ICRA), 2015:2673-2678.
MYNDERSE J A, CHIU GTC. Two-degree-of-freedom hysteresis compensation for a dynamic mirror actuator[J]. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2016, 21(1):29-37.
BIGGIO M, OLIVERI A, STELLINO F, et al.. A circuit model of hysteresis and creep[J]. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, 2015, 62(5):501-505.
IYER R V, TAN X B, KRISHNAPRASAD P S. Approximate inversion of the Preisach hysteresis operator with application to control of smart actuators[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2005, 50(6):798-810.
XIAO S L, LI Y M. Modeling and high dynamic compensating the rate-dependent hysteresis of piezoelectric actuators via a novel modified inverse Preisach model[J]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2012, 99:1-9.
XU Q S. Identification and compensation of piezoelectric hysteresis without modeling hysteresis inverse[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2013, 60(9):3927-3937.
CUI Y G, SUN B Y, DONG W J, et al..Causes for hysteresis and nonlinearity of piezoelectric ceramic actuators[J].Opt. Precision Eng., 2003, 11(3):270-275.(in Chinese)