As traditional orientation method depends heavily on measurement spaces and it is great difficult to implement the orientation of large dimension instruments in a limited space. Therefore
a two-face reciprocal orientation method was proposed to implement the orientation of a spherical coordinate measurement system in the limited space
and the theory analysis and experiment verification were performed by taking two laser trackers for example. With combination of measuring principle and working characteristics of laser trackers
the geometrical constraints of the method were constructed by motion characteristics of the probes in trackers. So
if the instruments to be measured were visible each other
they will be orientated by the smaller public view field. The mathematical modeling and optimization of this method were elaborated. Then
the experimental verification was performed on an establishment processing of circular measuring control network in Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility(SSRF). The results indicate that the precision of the proposed method is within 0.12 mm and the orientation rotation angle error is less than 1.5"when the two laser trackers are 5m away from each other. As compared to that of traditional orientation method
the measuring efficiency of the method has been obviously promoted with almost the same precision level in a limited space. The method can also be applied to other single station coordinate measuring systems.
关键词
Keywords
references
KAGERMANN H, HELBIG J, HELLINGER A, et al .. Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0: securing the future of German manufacturing industry[R]. Final Report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group. Federal Ministry of Education and Research, 2013.
SCHMITT R H, PETEREK M, MORSE E, et al.. Advances in large-scale metrology-review and future trends[J]. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 2016, 65(2): 643-665.
ZHANG D F, ROLT S, MAROPOULOS P G. Modelling and optimization of novel laser multilateration schemes for high-precision applications[J]. Measurement Science and Technology, 2005, 16(12): 2541-2547.
MURALIKRISHNAN B, PHILLIPS S, SAWYER D. Laser trackers for large-scale dimensional metrology: a review[J]. Precision Engineering, 2016, 44: 13-28.
LIN J R, ZHU J G, ZHANG H L, et al.. Field evaluation of laser tracker angle measurement error[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 2012, 33(2): 463-468. (in Chinese)
LIU J Y, YANG J Q, DONG D F, et al.. Optoelectronic aiming and orientation system of laser tracker[J]. Opt. Precision Eng., 2015, 23(6): 1558-1564. (in Chinese)
WEI F Q, DREYER K, UMBRICHT H. Status of the SLS alignment system[C]. Proceedings of the 7 th International Workshop on Accelerator Alignment , IWAA , 2002.
YU CH H, DONG L, KE M, et al.. The plane accuracy research of 3D control network based on laser tracker in large-scale space[J]. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 2008, 33(2): 42-44. (in Chinese)
HAN L C, ZHANG J X, YANG F, et al.. Estimation of the GSSM calibration error[J]. Applied Optics, 2016, 55(31): 8884-8892.
MUELANER J E, CAI B, MAROPOULOS P G. Large-volume metrology instrument selection and measurability analysis[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 2010, 224(6): 853-868.
HUGHES B, FORBES A, LEWIS A, et al.. Laser tracker error determination using a network measurement[J]. Measurement Science and Technology, 2011, 22(4): 045103.
YU CH H, KE M, DU H W, et al.. Global horizontal control network of Shanghai synchrotron radiation facility[J]. Atomic Energy Science and Technology, 2009, 43(10): 931-934. (in Chinese)
REN Y, LIN J R, ZHU J G, et al.. Coordinate transformation uncertainty analysis in large-scale metrology[J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2015, 64(9): 2380-2388.
ALLAN A L. The principles of theodolite intersection systems[J]. Survey Review, 1988, 29(227): 226-234.
LOURAKIS M I A. A brief description of the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm implemented by levmar[J]. Foundation of Research and Technology, 2005, 4(1): 1-6.