It is desirable to avoid the error and noise sensitivity of second-order tensor data leading to the disadvantages of low positioning accuracy with the Euler inversion method of magnetic object single-point positioning. For single-point positioning with only first-order tensor data
a method based on tensor derivative invariant relations is proposed. For the analysis of the magnetic dipole source tensor invariant and eigenvalue
two tensor derivative invariant relations were derived. The angle between the magnetic moment and position vector is constant and related to the tensor eigenvalue. The eigenvector of the absolute-minimum eigenvalue is perpendicular to the magnetic moment and position vector
and the eigenvectors of the remaining eigenvalues are coplanar with them. Thus
four possible solutions with respect to the quadrants of a plane above the magnetic source center were obtained
and the unique solution can be determined by the actual orientation and measured data. The results show that after error correction of the magnetic gradient tensor system
the positioning accuracy of a small-scale magnet (diameter of 5 cm
thickness of 0.5 cm) can be controlled within a root mean square error of 5 cm. Compared with the Euler inversion method
the proposed method has a greater detection distance with the same noise and exhibits a more reliable result.
关键词
Keywords
references
CHMIDT P W, CLARK D A. The magnetic gradient tensor: Its properties and uses in source characterization[J]. The Leading Edge , 2006, 25(1): 75-78.
ZHANG CH D. Airborne tensor magnetic gradiometry——the latest progess of airborne magnetometric technology[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Geophysics , 2006, 3(5): 354-361. (in Chinese)
LI Q Z, LI Z N, ZHANG Y T, et al .. Artificial vector calibration method for differencing magnetic gradient tensor systems[J]. Sensors , 2018, 18(2):361.
YIN G, ZHANG Y T, MI S L, et al .. Multiple magnetic targets inversion technique based on tilt angle and Helbig method[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University , 2017, 51(5): 577-584. (in Chinese)
LEE K M, LI M. Magnetic tensor sensor for gradient-ba-sed localization of ferrous object in geomagnetic field[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics , 2016, 52 (8):1-10.
ZHANG ZH Y, XIAO CH, GAO J J, et al .. Experiment research of magnetic dipole model applicability for a magnetic object[J]. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering , 2010, 18(5): 862-868. (in Chinese)
NARA T, SUZUKI S, ANDO S. A closed-form formula for magnetic dipole localization by measurement of its magnetic field and spatial gradients[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics , 2006, 42(10): 3291-3293.
SUN A, GUO H, TIAN M Y, et al .. Application of aeromagnetic three-component survey based on the Euler deconvolution method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics , 2017, 60(11): 4491-4505. (in Chinese)
YIN G, ZHANG Y T, FAN H B, et al .. Magnetic dipole localization based on magnetic gradient tensor data at a single point[J]. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing , 2014, 8(1):083596.
LI Q ZH, LI ZH N, ZHANG Y T, et al .. Fast rotation calibration of sensor array in magnetic gradient tensor system[J]. Opt. Precision Eng., 2018, 26(7): 1813-1826. (in Chinese)
LI Q ZH, LI ZH N, ZHANG Y T, et al .. Integrated calibration of magnetic gradient tensor system based on ellipsoid fitting[J]. Journal of Chinese Inertial Technology , 2018, 26(2): 187-195. (in Chinese)
YIN G, ZHANG L, XIE Y, et al .. Nonlinear calibration method of magnetic gradient tensor system[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument , 2018, 39(4):35-43. (in Chinese)
SALAM M A. Static Magnetic Field [M]. Electromagnetic Field Theories for Engineering. Singapore: Springer, 2014: 141-185.
LV J W, CHI CH, YU ZH T, et al .. Research on the asphericity error elimination of the invariant of magnetic gradient tensor[J]. Acta Physica Sinica , 2015, 64(19): 60-67. (in Chinese)
WANG M, LUO Y, LUO F, et al .. The application and development of Euler deconvolution in gravity and magnetic field[J]. Geophysical & Geochemical Exploration , 2012, 36(5): 834-841. (in Chinese)
CHAI T, DRAXLER R R. Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)?—Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature[J]. Geoscientific Model Development , 2014, 7(3): 1247-1250.