风云三号A星紫外臭氧垂直探测仪反演产品的比较和评估

黄富祥; 刘年庆; 张 鹏; 赵明现; 董超华

doi:10.3788/OPE.20101807.1568

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

风云三号A星紫外臭氧垂直探测仪反演产品的比较和评估

微纳技术与精密机械 | 更新时间：2020-08-12

- 风云三号A星紫外臭氧垂直探测仪反演产品的比较和评估
- Comparison and evaluation of retrieved ozone profiles from solar backscatter ultraviolet sounder on FY-3A satellite
- 光学精密工程 2010年18卷第7期页码：1568-1576
- 作者机构：
  
  中国气象局中国遥感卫星辐射测量和定标重点开放实验室国家卫星气象中心,北京100081
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 40775024)();国家重点基础研究计划资助项目(No.2005CB422202)();国家科技支撑计划资助项目(No.2008B
- DOI：10.3788/OPE.20101807.1568
  中图分类号：
- 收稿日期：2009-06-25，
  
  修回日期：2009-09-08，
  
  网络出版日期：2010-07-30，
  
  纸质出版日期：2010-07-20
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
黄富祥, 刘年庆, 张鹏, 赵明现, 董超华. 风云三号A星紫外臭氧垂直探测仪反演产品的比较和评估[J]. 光学精密工程, 2010,18(7): 1568-1576

HUANG Fu-xiang, LIU Nian-qing, ZHANG Peng, ZHAO Ming-xian, DONG Chao-hua. Comparison and evaluation of retrieved ozone profiles from solar backscatter ultraviolet sounder on FY-3A satellite[J]. 光学精密工程, 2010,18(7): 1568-1576
黄富祥, 刘年庆, 张鹏, 赵明现, 董超华. 风云三号A星紫外臭氧垂直探测仪反演产品的比较和评估[J]. 光学精密工程, 2010,18(7): 1568-1576 DOI： 10.3788/OPE.20101807.1568.

HUANG Fu-xiang, LIU Nian-qing, ZHANG Peng, ZHAO Ming-xian, DONG Chao-hua. Comparison and evaluation of retrieved ozone profiles from solar backscatter ultraviolet sounder on FY-3A satellite[J]. 光学精密工程, 2010,18(7): 1568-1576 DOI： 10.3788/OPE.20101807.1568.

摘要

为了考察和评估我国首次自主研制并由新一代极地轨道气象卫星风云三号携带的紫外臭氧垂直探测仪SBUS的观测数据和反演产品的精度和稳定性

利用SBUS在轨观测数据开展了臭氧垂直氧廓线反演试验

并将反演产品与NOAA卫星同类仪器SBUV/2产品数据进行了系统比较。首先使用自主研发的风云三号紫外臭氧垂直廓线反演算法FY_V1.0开展臭氧廓线反演试验

输入数据为SBUS 2008年7月17日~8月30日在轨观测数据。然后

采用3种方法

即匹配像元数据直接比较

赤道地区平均反演廓线比较以及反演廓线与先验廓线残差比较

将反演结果与SBUV/2产品进行了比较。最后

基于各种比较结果进行分析和评估。结果显示

与NOAA-16和17卫星SBUV/2反演产品相比

SBUS反演产品多数高度层相对偏差百分率在10%之间

部分层相对偏差达到15%;在20N~20S比较平均反演臭氧垂直廓线

最大差异为5.4 DU

最小差异为0

多数在0.3 DU之间;比较反演廓线与先验廓线的残差表明

较大残差发生的高度以及残差正负性等方面存在明显差异。结论认为

在未对数据做任何订正的条件下

SBUS反演臭氧垂直廓线产品在多数高度层精度尚可

但是

与SBUV/2产品相比

SBUS获取的臭氧垂直廓线存在较大的系统性偏差

需要通过与SBUV/2的交叉定标进行订正。

Abstract

In order to evaluate the precision and stability of ozone profiles from the Solar Backscatter Ultraviolet Sounder (SBUS) on FY-3A satellite

the retrieval experiments were carried out by using SBUS measurements and the ozone profiles from SBUS and those from SBUV/2 on NOAA satellites were compared. Firstly

on the basis of FY-3 ozone profile retrieval algorithm FY_V1.0

the ozone profile retrievals were undertaken by using the SBUS measurements during 17 July to 30 August 2008 as input data. Then

three kinds of methods were proposed to compare the retrieval data of SBUS with those of SBUV/2. These methods are the direct comparison of SBUS ozone profiles with those matching profiles of SBUV/2

comparison of SBUS mean ozone profiles with those of SBUV/2 in tropics and the comparison of residuals of retrieved and apriori ozone profiles of SBUS and SBUV/2. Finally

the comparison and evaluation results were analyzed. Comparison results indicate that the relative bias percentage of SBUS ozone profiles relative to those of SBUV/2 at matching pixels are within 10% at most layers

but reaches 15% at fewer layers; the differences of SBUS mean ozone profile with that of SBUV/2 in tropics are smaller than 0.3 DU at most layers. The biggest difference is 5.4 DU and the smallest is 0;the comparison of the residuals of retrieved and apriori ozone profiles shows notable difference between SBUS and SBUV/2 in the height of residual occured and the negatives and positives of the residuals.It is concluded that the precisions of SBUS ozone profiles are pretty good at most layers without doing any correction. But

there exists some remarkable differences between SBUS ozone profiles and those of SBUV/2. To improve the precisions of SBUS ozone profiles

it is necessary to put efforts on measurement correction based on inter-calibration with SBUV/2.

关键词

Keywords

references

KONDRATYEV K Y,VAROTSOS C. Atmospheric ozone variability, Springer-Baris in Environmental Sciences [M]. Springer Published in association with Praxis Publishing, Chichester, UK, 2000.

WMO/UNEP. Scientific Assessment of ozone depletion:2006[M]. WMO, 2006.

WMO/UNEP. Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion:2002[M]. WMO, 2002.

WMO/UNEP. Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion:1998[M].WMO, 1998.

WMO/UNEP. Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion:1994[M]. WMO, 1994.

黄富祥,刘年庆,赵明现,等. 利用风云三号卫星紫外臭氧垂直探测仪观测数据反演臭氧垂直廓线[J]. 科学通报,2009,54(9):2556-2561. HUANG F X, LIU N Q, ZHAO M X, et al.. Vertical ozone profiles deduced from measurements of SBUS on FY-3 satellite[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2009,54(9):2556-2561.

黄富祥,赵明现,杨昌军,等. 风云三号卫星紫外臭氧垂直廓线反演算法及对比反演试验[J]. 自然科学进展,2008,18(10):1136-1142. HUANG F X, ZHAO M X, YANG C J,et al..Comparative retrieval experiments of ozone profiles retreival algorithm of FY-3 satellite[J]. Progress in Natural Science, 2008,18(10):1136-1142.

BHARTIA P K, MCPETERS R D,MATEER C L, et al.. Algorithm for the estimation of vertical ozone profiles from the backscattered ultraviolet technique[J]. J.Geophys.Res., 1996,101(D13):18793-18806.

STOLARKSKI R S, KRUEGER A J,SCHOEB-ERL M R, et al.. Nimbus 7 satellite measurements of the springtime Antarctic ozone decrease[J]. Nature, 1986,322:808-811.

BOJKOV R D, FIOLETOV V F. Estimating the global ozone characteristics during the last 30 years[J]. J.Geophys.Res., 1995,100:16537-16551.

RANDEL W J, STOLARSKI R S,CUNNOLD D M, et al.. Trends in the vertical distribution of ozone[J]. Science, 1999,285:1689-1692.

CELARIER E A, FLITTNER D E. What you need to know to run TOMRAD[M]. TOMRAD user guide,2001.

RODGERS C D. Retrieval of atmospheric temperature and composition from remote measurements of Thermal Radiation[J]. Reviews of Geophysics and Space Physics, 1976,14:609-624.

RODGERS C D. Characterization and error analysis of profiles retrieved from remote sounding measurements[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1990,95(D5):5587- 5595.

KLENK K F,BHARTIA P K,FLEIG A J, et al.. Vertical ozone profile determination from Nimbus-7 SBUV measurements .Fifth conference on Atmospheric Radiation, Baltimore, Maryland, PP 103-106, 1983.

FLEIG A J, KLENK K F,BHARTIA P K, et al.. Vertical ozone profile results from the Nimbus-4 BUV data . the Fourth conference on Atmospheric Radiation, Toronto, American Meteorological Society, Boston, Massachussetts, 20-26, 1981.

浏览量

557

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

青藏高原卫星紫外后向散射辐射的正演仿真