外磁场方位及磁珠位置和团聚对巨磁阻生物传感器检测的影响

李福泉; 冯洁; 陈翔; 石海平

doi:10.3788/OPE.20101811.2437

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

外磁场方位及磁珠位置和团聚对巨磁阻生物传感器检测的影响

微纳技术与精密机械 | 更新时间：2020-08-12

- 外磁场方位及磁珠位置和团聚对巨磁阻生物传感器检测的影响
- Influence of orientation of external magnetic field, position and aggregation of magnetic beads on signal of GMR biosensor
- 光学精密工程 2010年18卷第11期页码：2437-2442
- 作者机构：
  
  上海交通大学微纳科学技术研究院微米/纳米加工技术国家级重点实验室薄膜与微细技术教育部重点实验室上海,200240
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家863高科技研究发展计划资助项目(No.2007AA04Z310)();国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.60971039)()
- DOI：10.3788/OPE.20101811.2437
  中图分类号： TP212.3
- 收稿日期：2010-03-09，
  
  修回日期：2010-04-05，
  
  网络出版日期：2010-11-25，
  
  纸质出版日期：2010-11-25
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
李福泉, 冯洁, 陈翔, 石海平. 外磁场方位及磁珠位置和团聚对巨磁阻生物传感器检测的影响[J]. 光学精密工程, 2010,18(11): 2437-2442

LI Fu-quan, FENG Jie, CHEN Xiang, SHI Hai-ping. Influence of orientation of external magnetic field, position and aggregation of magnetic beads on signal of GMR biosensor[J]. Editorial Office of Optics and Precision Engineering, 2010,18(11): 2437-2442
李福泉, 冯洁, 陈翔, 石海平. 外磁场方位及磁珠位置和团聚对巨磁阻生物传感器检测的影响[J]. 光学精密工程, 2010,18(11): 2437-2442 DOI： 10.3788/OPE.20101811.2437.

LI Fu-quan, FENG Jie, CHEN Xiang, SHI Hai-ping. Influence of orientation of external magnetic field, position and aggregation of magnetic beads on signal of GMR biosensor[J]. Editorial Office of Optics and Precision Engineering, 2010,18(11): 2437-2442 DOI： 10.3788/OPE.20101811.2437.

摘要

实现GMR生物传感器对磁珠及其偶联的生物分子的定量检测

必须考虑磁场方位及磁珠位置和磁珠团聚对检测方法的影响。本文首先利用Comsol软件模拟了这3个因素对GMR传感器输出信号的影响

模拟结果表明

外磁场倾斜、磁珠位置偏离电阻条中心和磁珠团聚均会使信号减小

其中外磁场倾斜影响尤甚;当外磁场倾斜为0.5时

磁珠的信号会减小80%。为了与模拟结果进行比对

制备了与模型相同的线宽为5 m 的GMR生物传感器

并测量了输出信号与磁珠覆盖率的关系。测试结果显示

二者呈线性趋势

但与线性关系存在一定程度的偏离。另外

当磁珠覆盖率为23.6%时

实验测得的信号为63 V

比模拟结果的247 V偏小。实验显示这两种偏差均源于前述3个因素对GMR信号的影响。因此

用GMR传感器对磁珠进行定量检测时

为使信号大小与磁珠个数呈线性关系

应保证以下测试条件:外磁场尽可能垂直于传感器平面;测试过程中外磁场倾斜角不能变化;设法使磁珠集中于电阻条中间区域;尽量保证磁珠不团聚。

Abstract

To quantitatively measure the number of magnetic beads and their binding biomolecules by a Giant Magnet Resistance(GMR) biosensor

the influences of the orientation of external magnetic field

the positions and the aggregation of magnetic beads on the biosensor signals should be considered. In this paper

the influences of three kinds of factors are simulated using Comsol software and the simulated results show that the signal amplitudes of the biosensor would be reduced by the tilt of external field

the deviation of bead position from the central area of sensor strips

and the aggregation of beads

especial the tilt of external field. When the tilt is 0.5

the signal will decrease by 80%. Comparing with the simulated results

a GMR biosensor with the width of 5 m is fabricated. The dependence of signal outputs on the coverage of magnetic beads is measured and results indicate that it is a linear relation with some deviations. Furthermore

the experimental result is 63 V when the coverage of magnetic beads is 23.6%

which is smaller than the simulated result in 247 V. Obtained results prove that both kinds of deviations are owing to the three factors. To measure the magnetic beads quantitatively

it suggests that the measuring conditions should be as fellows: making the external magnetic field perpendicular to the sensor plane; keeping the tilt angle unchanged during the measuring process; putting the magnetic beads to concentrate at the central area of the sensor strips; and avoiding the magnetic bead aggregation.

关键词

Keywords

references

<td valign='top'>[1]MEGENS M, PRINS M. Magnetic biochips: a newoption for sensitive diagnostics [J].Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials.2005,293 (1):702-708<a href='http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2005.02.046' target='_blank'><img src='../../images/crossref.gif' width='41' height='15' border='0' /><td valign='top'>[2]MILLER M M, SHEEHAN P E, EDELSTEIN R L, et al.. A DNA array sensor utilizing magnetic microbeads and magnetoelectronic detection [J]. J. of Mag. and Mag. Mater., 2001,225(1-2):138-144.<td valign='top'>[3]RIFE J C, MILLER M M, SHEEHAN P E, et al.. Design and performance of GMR sensors for the detection of magnetic microbeads in biosensors [J]. Sensors and Actuators A, 2003,107(3):209-218.<td valign='top'>[4]BASELT D R, LEE G U, NATESAN M, et al.. A biosensor based on magnetoresistance technology [J].Biosensors & Bioelectronics</em.1998,13(7-8):731-739<a href='http://dx.doi.org/iosensors' target='_blank'><img src='../../images/crossref.gif' width='41' height='15' border='0' /><td valign='top'>[5]EDELSTEIN R L, TAMANAHA C R, SHEE- HAN P E, et al.. The BARC biosensor applied to the detection of biological warfare agents [J].Biosensors & Bioelectronics,</em.2000,14(10-11):805-813<a href='http://dx.doi.org/iosensors' target='_blank'><img src='../../images/crossref.gif' width='41' height='15' border='0' /><td valign='top'>[6]SCHOTTER J, KAMP P B, BECKER A, et al.. Comparison of a prototype magnetoresistive biosensor to standard fluorescent DNA detection [J]. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 2004,19(10):1149-1156.<td valign='top'>[7]GRAHAMA D L, FERREIRA H A, FELICIANO N, et al.. Magnetic field-assisted DNA hybridisation and simultaneous detection using micron-sized spin-valve sensors and magnetic nanoparticles[J]. Sensors and Actuators B, 2005,107(2):936-944.<td valign='top'>[8]EJSING L, HANSEN M F, MENON A K, et al.. Magnetic microbead detection using the planar Hall effect [J].Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials.2005,293(1):677-684<a href='http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2005.02.071' target='_blank'><img src='../../images/crossref.gif' width='41' height='15' border='0' /><td valign='top'>[9]SCHEPPER W, SCHOTTER J,BR CKL H, et al.. Analysing a magnetic molecule detection system-computer simulation [J]. Journal of Biotechnology, 2004,112(1-2):35-46.<td valign='top'>[10]王永强,冯洁,陈翔,等. 生物传感用巨磁电阻传感器及其磁珠检测性能 [J]. 真空科学与技术学报,2009,29(4):359-363. WANG Y Q, FENG J, CHEN X, et al.. Detection of commercial magnetic microbeads with giant magneto resistance sensors [J]. 2009, 29(4):359-363. (in Chinese)

浏览量

649

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

暂无数据