浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1. 中国科学院 长春光学精密机械与物理研究所 中国科学院光学系统先进制造 技术重点实验室, 吉林 长春 130033
2. 中国科学院 研究生院,北京 100039
收稿日期:2010-09-25,
修回日期:2011-03-24,
网络出版日期:2012-03-22,
纸质出版日期:2012-03-22
移动端阅览
张金平, 张学军, 张忠玉, 郑立功. Shack-Hartmann波前传感器检测大口径圆对称非球面反射镜[J]. 光学精密工程, 2012,(3): 492-498
ZHANG Jin-ping, ZHANG Xue-jun, ZHANG Zhong-yu, ZHENG Li-gong. Test of rotationally symmetric aspheric surface using Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor[J]. Editorial Office of Optics and Precision Engineering, 2012,(3): 492-498
张金平, 张学军, 张忠玉, 郑立功. Shack-Hartmann波前传感器检测大口径圆对称非球面反射镜[J]. 光学精密工程, 2012,(3): 492-498 DOI: 10.3788/OPE.20122003.0492.
ZHANG Jin-ping, ZHANG Xue-jun, ZHANG Zhong-yu, ZHENG Li-gong. Test of rotationally symmetric aspheric surface using Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor[J]. Editorial Office of Optics and Precision Engineering, 2012,(3): 492-498 DOI: 10.3788/OPE.20122003.0492.
针对大口径非球面反射镜在研磨阶段后期其面形与理想面形存在较大偏差
且表面粗糙度较大、反射率较低
采用轮廓仪和普通干涉仪检测无法满足测试要求等问题
提出采用动态范围大且精度高的Shack-Hartmann波前传感器来检测大口径非球面反射镜。研究分析了Shack-Hartmann波前传感器检测系统的原理及系统误差并编写了相应的数据处理软件。为了验证该方法的可行性
对已经加工完成的350 mm口径旋转对称双曲面面形进行了检测
测量得到的面形误差PV值、RMS值分别为0.388、0.043(=632.8 nm);与干涉测量的标准结果进行了对比
得到的面形偏差PV值、RMS值分别为0.014和0.001。对比结果表明
Shack-Hartmann波前传感器的测量结果正确可靠
从而验证了Shack-Hartmann波前传感器检测大口径非球面反射镜的可行性。
As the surface shape of a reflection mirror is different from the target shape at the end stage of the grinding process
and the profilometers and common interferometers can not measure the surface error exactly
this paper proposed a method to measure the large aperture aspheric surface by using a Shack-Hartmann Wavefront Sensor (SHWS) with a large dynamic range and high precision. The principle of the measuring system for SHWS was researched
its measuring errors were analyzed and a corresponding data processing software was compiled. Using a simulation reference file
a hyperboloid reflection mirror with a diameter of 350 mm was tested by the SHWS. Results indicate that the PV and RMS of the surface error are 0.388 and 0.043
respectively (=632.8 nm). In order to testify the measurement result
the mirror is also measured by an interferometer with a null compensator. Comparing the two testing results
the PV and RMS of the deviation are 0.014 and 0.001
respectively
which proves the feasibility of measuring large aperture aspheric surfaces by SHWSs.
饶学军,凌宁,王成,等. 哈特曼-夏克传感器在非球面加工中的应用 [J].光学学报,2002(4):491-494. RAO X J,LING N,WANG CH, et al.. Application of Hartmann-Shack sensor in aspheric process[J].Acta Optica Sinica,2002(4):491-484.(in Chinese)[2] 程少园,曹召良,胡立发,等. 用夏克-哈特曼探测器测量人眼波前像差 [J].光学 精密工程,2010,18(5):1060-1067. CHENG SH Y,CAO ZH L,HU L F, et al.. Measurement of wavefront aberrations of human eyes with Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor[J].Opt. Precision Eng.,2010,18(5):1060-1067.(in Chinese)[3] YANG H S, LEE Y W, SONG J B, et al.. Null Hartmann test for the fabrication of large aspheric surfaces [J].Opt.Exp.,2005:1839-1847.[4] PFUND J, LINDLEIN N, SCHWIDER J, et al.. Absolute sphericity measurement: a comparative study of the use of interferometry and a Shack-Hartmann sensor[J].Opt.Lett.,1998,23:742-744.[5] NOVAK J, NOVAK P, MIKS A, et al.. Application of Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor for testing optical systems[J].SPIE,2007,6609(15):1-11.[6] 刘春阳,朱秋东. 自准直哈特曼波前测量装置的研制 [J].光学技术,2008,38(1):98-104. LIU CH Y,ZHU Q D. The development of self referenced Hartmann wavefront sensor[J].Optical Technique,2008, 38(1):98-104.(in Chinese)[7] 夏明亮,李抄,刘肇南,等. Shack-Hartmann波前传感器图像自适应阈值的选择 [J].光学 精密工程,2010,18(2): 334-340. XIA M L,LI CH,LIU ZH N, et al.. Adaptive threshold selection method for Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensors[J].Opt. Precision Eng., 2010,18(2):334-340.(in Chinese)[8] MALACARA D. Optical Shop Testing[M].New York:Wiley,2007.[9] SOUTHWELL W H. Wavefront estimation from wave-front slope measurements[J].J.Opt.Soc.Am.,1980,70:998-1006.[10] 曹正林,廖文和,沈建新,等. Zernike多项式拟合人眼波前像差的一种新算法 [J].光学 精密工程,2006,14(2):308-314. CHAO ZH L,LIAO W H,SHEN J X. A new algorithm for human eye’s wave-front aberration fitting with Zernike polynomial [J].Opt. Precision Eng.,2006,14(2):308-314.(in Chinese)[11] 李华强,宋贺伦,饶长辉,等. 增大夏克-哈特曼波前传感器动态测量范围的方法 [J].光学 精密工程,2008,16(7):1203-1207 LI H Q,SONG H L,RAO CH H, et al.. Extrapolation method to extend dynamic range of Shack-Hartmann wave-front sensor[J].Opt. Precision Eng.,2008, 16(7):1203-1207.(in Chinese)[12] PFUND J, LINDLEIN N, SCHWIDER J. Misalignment effects of the Shack-Hartmann sensor[J].J.Opt.Soc.Am., 1998,37(1):22-27.[13] NEAL D R, ARMSTRONG D J, TURNER W T. Wavefront sensors for control and process monitoring in optics manufacture[J].SPIE,1997,2993:211-220.[14] PFUND J, LINDLEIN N, SCHWIDER J. Nonnull testing of rotationally symmetric aspheres: a systematic error assessment[J].J.Opt.Soc.Am,2001,40(4):439-446.
0
浏览量
319
下载量
14
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构