浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1. 中国科学院 长春光学精密机械与物理研究所,吉林 长春,中国,130033
2. 中国科学院大学 北京,中国,100049
收稿日期:2013-08-10,
纸质出版日期:2014-01-15
移动端阅览
张明月, 杨洪波, 章家保等. 改进自抗扰控制谐波式电动舵机伺服系统[J]. 光学精密工程, 2014,22(1): 99-108
ZHANG Ming-yue, YANG Hong-bo, ZHANG Jia-bao etc. Servo system of harmonic drive electromechanical actuator using improved ADRC[J]. Editorial Office of Optics and Precision Engineering, 2014,22(1): 99-108
张明月, 杨洪波, 章家保等. 改进自抗扰控制谐波式电动舵机伺服系统[J]. 光学精密工程, 2014,22(1): 99-108 DOI: 10.3788/OPE.20142201.0099.
ZHANG Ming-yue, YANG Hong-bo, ZHANG Jia-bao etc. Servo system of harmonic drive electromechanical actuator using improved ADRC[J]. Editorial Office of Optics and Precision Engineering, 2014,22(1): 99-108 DOI: 10.3788/OPE.20142201.0099.
针对电动舵机系统的非线性、快时变等特点
提出了改进的自抗扰控制器以改善系统的位置跟踪性能。首先
给出电动舵机的系统模型及控制策略
分析了系统中非线性因素的影响;设计了改进自抗扰控制器
并利用现代控制理论给出了控制器参数的选择方法。然后
在舵机系统中进行仿真分析
验证了该控制器的可行性。最后
基于谐波式电动舵机对改进的自抗扰控制器与常规自抗扰控制器及PI控制器进行对比实验。实验结果表明:跟踪10 sin(5 πt)正弦信号时
改进自抗扰控制器能够消除位置平顶和速度死区
相位滞后为0.087 22 rad;跟踪±1°~±15°角位置时
上升时间为9~18 ms
超调量为0~7.25%
稳态均方差为0.007 60~0.010 83
性能明显优于常规自抗扰控制器和PI控制器。得到的数据显示该控制器减少了设计参数
位置跟踪超调量小
响应时间快
稳态均方差小
改善了舵机系统的动态和稳态性能。
Because Electromechanical Actuator (EMA) is a nonlinear
time-varying servo system
this paper proposes an improved Active Disturbance Rejection Controller(ADRC) to improve the tracking performance of the EMA. First
the mathematical model and control strategy of the EMA were presented and the nonlinear factors influencing the performance of EMA were analyzed by the control theory. Then
the improved ADRC was described and the method to select parameters were given by modern control theory. Furthermore
the feasibility of this controller was demonstrated through a simulation under different input conditions. Finally
the performance of PI controller
ADRC
and improved ADRC was compared by experiments on a harmonic drive EMA servo system. Experimental results indicate that the improved ADRC controller can remove the position flat crest and velocity dead space
and its phase error is 0.087 22 rad when the angular position signal of 10 sin(5 πt) is tracked. Furthermore
the rise time
overshoot and the steady state mean square deviation of EMA system are 9-18 ms
0-7.25%
0.007 60-0.010 83
respectively
when ±1°-±15°angular positions are tracked. These results means that the performance of the improved ADRC is better than those of the PI controller and traditional ADRC. It has a fast response
slight overshoot and high accuracy in stability
as well as strong anti-disturbance and robustness.
彭书华, 李华德, 苏中, 等.不确定参数电动舵机滑模变结构控制[J]. 电机与控制学报, 2009, 13(1):128-132.
PENG SH H, LI H D, SU ZH, et al.. Sliding mode variable structure control of electric steering engine with uncertain parameters[J]. Electric Machines and control, 2009, 13(1):128-132. (in Chinese)
SEONG H, JANG M L, Adaptive dynamic surface control with sliding mode control and RWNN for robust positioning of a linear motion stage [J]. Mechatronics, 2012, 22:222-238.
骆光照.电动舵机的鲁棒控制器[D], 西安:西北工业大学, 2003.
LUO G ZH. Robust Control Application in Electromechanical Actuator [D]. Xi’an: College of Automatization Northwesten Polytechnical University, 2003.(in Chinese)
曹登刚.混沌优化及其在电动舵机控制系统上的应用[D].湘潭:湘潭大学, 2008.
CAO D G. Chaos Optimization and its Application in the Control System of Electro-mechanical Actuators [D]. Xiangtan:Xiangtan university, 2008. (in Chinese)
MILAN R, ZARKO C, DRAGAN L. Intelligent control of DC motor driven electromechanical fin actuator[J]. Control Engineering Practice, 2012, 20: 610-617.
陈茂胜, 金光, 张涛, 等.积分反馈自抗扰控制力矩陀螺框架伺服系统设计[J]. 光学 精密工程, 2012, 20(11):2424-2432.
CHEN M SH, JIN G, ZHANG T, et al.. Design of gimbal servo system of CMG using active disturbance rejection control with integral feedback[J]. Opt. Precision Eng., 2012, 20(11):2424-2432. (in Chinese)
薛立娟, 李海涛, 李红, 等.基于ADRC的MSCMG 框架系统高精度控制[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2012, 38(11):1497-1501.
XUE L J, LI H T, LI H, et al.. High precision control based on ADRC used in gimbal system of MSCMG[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2012, 38(11):1497-1501. (in Chinese)
于海滨, 肖本贤, 郁伉.基于改进型ADRC的双轴伺服系统摩擦补偿研究[J].合肥工业大学学报, 2010, 3(11):1634-1638.
YU H B, XIAO B X, YU K, et al.. Study of friction compensation in bi-axis servo system based on improved ADRC [J]. Journal of Hefei University of Technology, 2010, 3(11):1634-1638. (in Chinese)
崇阳, 张科, 王靖宇.一种基于模糊ADRC的舵机控制算法设计与实现[J]. 西北工业大学学报, 2011, 29(2):217-222.
CHONG Y, ZHANG K, WANG J Y. Design and application of a servo control system based on a fuzzy active disturbance rejection control[J]. College of Automatization Northwesten Polytechnical University, 2011, 29(2):217-222. (in Chinese)
付永领, 陈辉, 刘和松, 等.基于自抗扰控制的导弹电液舵机系统研究[J]. 宇航学报, 2012, 31(4):1051-1055.
FU Y Y, CH H, LIU H S, et al.. Study on missile electro-hydraulic actuator system based on active disturbance rejection control method[J]. Journal of Astronautics, 2012, 31(4):1051-1055. (in Chinese)
谭文斌, 李醒飞, 向红标, 等.应用稳态误差分析辨识LuGre模型参数[J].光学 精密工程, 2011, 19(3):664-671.
TAN W B, LI X F, XIANG H B, et al.. Parameter identification of LuGre model based on analysis of steady state error[J]. Opt. Precision Eng., 2011, 19(3):664-671. (in Chinese)
于伟, 马佳光, 李锦英, 等.基于模型实现精密伺服转台摩擦参数辨识及补偿[J]. 光学 精密工程, 2011, 19(11):2736-2743.
YU W, MA J G, LI J Y, et al.. Friction parameter identification and friction compensation for precision servo turning table[J]. Opt. Precision Eng., 2011, 19(11):2736-2743. (in Chinese)
ZHI Q G. Scaling and bandwidth-parameterization based controller tuning [C]. Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Denver, 2003, 6:4989-4996.
韩京清.自抗扰控制技术—估计补偿不确定因素的控制技术[M].北京:国防工业出版社, 2008.
HAN J Q. Active Disturbance Rejection Control Technique-the Technique for Estimating and Compensating the Uncertainties [M]. Beijing: National Defence Industry Press, 2008. (in Chinese)
王宇航, 姚郁, 马克茂.Fal函数滤波器的分析及应用[J]. 电机与控制学报, 2010, 14(11):88-99.
WANG Y H, YAO Y, MA K M. Analysis and application of Fal function filter[J]. Electric Machines and Control, 2010, 14(11):88-99. (in Chinese)
0
浏览量
235
下载量
12
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构