浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
天津大学 精密测试技术及仪器 国家重点实验室 天津,300072
收稿日期:2014-03-14,
修回日期:2014-04-10,
纸质出版日期:2014-11-25
移动端阅览
赵建远, 李醒飞, 田凌子. 基于BJ辅助变量法实现动力调谐陀螺仪的闭环辨识[J]. 光学精密工程, 2014,22(11): 3028-3037
ZHAO Jian-yuan, Li Xing-fei, Tian Ling-zi. Closed-loop identification of dynamically tuned gyro based on BJIV method[J]. Editorial Office of Optics and Precision Engineering, 2014,22(11): 3028-3037
赵建远, 李醒飞, 田凌子. 基于BJ辅助变量法实现动力调谐陀螺仪的闭环辨识[J]. 光学精密工程, 2014,22(11): 3028-3037 DOI: 10.3788/OPE.20142211.3028.
ZHAO Jian-yuan, Li Xing-fei, Tian Ling-zi. Closed-loop identification of dynamically tuned gyro based on BJIV method[J]. Editorial Office of Optics and Precision Engineering, 2014,22(11): 3028-3037 DOI: 10.3788/OPE.20142211.3028.
为了在闭环工作条件下监测动力调谐陀螺仪的性能
研究了动力调谐陀螺仪的闭环辨识方法。首先
根据动力调谐陀螺仪闭环模型的复杂结构
对其进行化简和离散化处理
获取辨识模型集和模型阶数。接着
将辅助变量法(Ⅳ)应用于动力调谐陀螺仪的闭环辨识
并根据传统Ⅳ法的不足
提出了BJIV辨识法。该方法能够应用于BJ模型
使系统模型与噪声模型不再受辨识模型的限制。然后
利用仿真分析的方法
分析BJIV法辨识结果的无偏性与渐进离散特性。最后
采用提出的方法对某型号动力调谐陀螺仪进行单次和连续闭环辨识实验。仿真结果表明:BJIV法的辨识结果在有噪声存在的条件下是一致无偏的
渐进方差能够接近最优;闭环辨识实验结果表明:辨识拟合度优于90%
连续跟踪2 h
获得了可靠的辨识结果。
To monitor the performance of a Dynamic Tuned Gyro (DTG) on-line under closed-loop working conditions
a closed-loop identification approach was explored for the DTG system. Firstly
the plant model was simplified and discretized to obtain the identification model set and model order based on the complex model structure of DTG closed-loop system. Then
the Instrumental Variable (IV) method was used to the closed-loop identification of the DTG. Aiming at the deficiency of the traditional Ⅳ method
a BJIV method was proposed. The method was applied to BJ model so that the plant model and noise model were not restricted by the identification model. Furthermore
simulations were used to analyze the consistency and asymptotic distribution of the BJIV method. Finally
single and continuous identification experiments were conducted on a DTG closed-loop system. Obtained results indicate that the estimations of BJIV method are unbiased and consistent with different noise levels
and its asymptotic variance is near-optimal. The experiment results on closed-loop identification show that the identification fitting degree is more than 90%. After continuous experiments for two hours
DTG closed-loop system is stable and the identification results are reliable.
张连超. 动力调谐陀螺建模与数字化控制问题研究[D]. 长沙:国防科技大学博士学位论文,2007. ZHANG L CH. Study on modeling and digital control of dynamically tuned gyroscope [D]. Changsha:National University of Defence Technology Doctoral Dissertation, 2005. (in Chinese)
徐国平. 基于支持向量机的动力调谐陀螺仪寿命预测方法研究[D]. 上海:上海交通大学7,2008. XU G P. Research on life forecasting methods of a DTG based on support vector machine[D]. Shanghai:Shanghai Jiaotong University Doctoral Dissertation, 2008. (in Chinese)
张连超,范世珣,范大鹏,等. 动力调谐陀螺再平衡回路数字化的研究与实现[J]. 光学精密工程,2007,15(12):1974-1981. ZHANG L CH, FAN SH X, FAN D P, et al.. Research and implementation of digital control of dynamically tuned gyroscope rebalance loop[J]. Opt. Precision Eng., 2007, 15(12):1974-1981. (in Chinese)
ALI E, JOHN F M, PAUL A T. Direct and two-step methods for closed-loop identification: a comparison of asymptotic and finite data set performance[J]. Journal of Process Control, 2000, 10 (6): 525-537.
PAUL V H. Closed-loop issues in system identification[J]. Annual Reviews in Control, 1998, 22:173-186.
EDWIN T D, PAUL V H. Analysis of closed-loop identification with a tailor-made parameterization[J]. European Journal of Control, 2000, 6 (1):54-62.
FORSSELL U, LJUNG L. Closed-loop identification revisited[J]. Automatica, 1999, 35(7):1215-1241.
SODERSTROM, STOICA T P, TRULSSON E. Instrumental variable methods for closed-loop systems[C]. Proc. of the 10th IFAC World Congress on Automatic Control, 1987: 363-368.
ZHANG Y, WEN C Y, SOH Y C. Indirect Closed-Loop Identification by Optimal Instrumental Variable Method[J]. Automatica, 1997, 33(12): 2269-2271.
GILSON M, PAUL V H. On the relation between a bias-eliminated least-squares (BELS) and an IV estimator in closed-loop identification[J]. Automatica, 2001, 37(10): 1593-1600.
GILSON M, PAUL V H. Instrumental variable methods for closed-loop system identification[J]. Automatica, 2005, 41: 903-908.
LJUNG L. System Identification: Theory for the User[M]. Prentice Hall PTR, 1999.
郝颖. 动力调谐陀螺仪关键技术研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工程大学,2006. HAO Y. Study on Crucial Technologies of Dynamically Tuned Gyroscope [D]. Harbin:Harbin Engineering University, 2006. (in Chinese)
姚杰,王建宏. 飞机颤振模态参数的辅助变量方差辨识及渐近分析[C]. 第三十一届中国控制会议,合肥,中国,2012:2005-2012. YAO J, WANG J H. Instrumental variable covariance method and asymptotic analysis for the aircraft flutter model parameter identification[C]. Proceedings of the 31st Chinese Control Conference, Heifei, 2012:2005-2012. (in Chinese)
GILSON M, GARNIER H, YOUNG P, et al.. A refined IV method for closed-loop system identification[C]. 14th IFAC Symposium on System Identification, Newcastle, 2006: 903-908.
肖前进,贾宏光,章家保,等. 电动舵机伺服系统非线性辨识及补偿[J]. 光学精密工程,2013,21(8):2038-2047. XIAO Q J, JIA H G, ZHANG J B, et al.. Identification and compensation of nonlinearity for electromechanical actuator servo system[J]. Opt. Precision Eng., 2013, 21(8):2038-2047. (in Chinese)
JUAN C A, GRANHAM C G, PAUL V H. A virtual closed-loop method for closed-loop identification[J]. Automatica, 2011, 47: 1626-1637.
YURI A W, HUANG B. Closed-loop identification condition for ARMAX models using routine operating data[J]. Automatica, 2011, 47: 1534-1537.
VINCENT T L, CARLO N, HSU K, et al.. Input design for structured nonlinear system identification[J]. Automatica, 2010, 46:990-998.
GEVERS M, LJUNG L, PAUL V H. Asymptotic variance expressions for closed-loop identification[J]. Automatica, 2001, 37:781-786.
0
浏览量
628
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构