柔性测量臂的RPY建模与误差标定

赵磊; 赵新华; 王收军; 葛为民

doi:10.3788/OPE.20162402.0365

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

柔性测量臂的RPY建模与误差标定

微纳技术与精密机械 | 更新时间：2020-08-13

- 柔性测量臂的RPY建模与误差标定
- RPY modeling and error calibration of flexible measuring arm
- 光学精密工程 2016年24卷第2期页码：365-371
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 天津市先进机电系统设计与智能控制重点实验室
  2. 天津理工大学机械工程学院天津,300384
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.51275353)();天津市应用基础与前沿技术研究计划重点资助项目(No.14JCZDJC39100)();天津市自然科学基金资助项目
- DOI：10.3788/OPE.20162402.0365
  中图分类号： TH721
- 收稿日期：2015-08-20，
  
  修回日期：2015-09-15，
  
  纸质出版日期：2016-02-25
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
赵磊, 赵新华, 王收军等. 柔性测量臂的RPY建模与误差标定[J]. 光学精密工程, 2016,24(2): 365-371

ZHAO Lei, ZHAO Xin-hua, WANG Shou-jun etc. RPY modeling and error calibration of flexible measuring arm[J]. Editorial Office of Optics and Precision Engineering, 2016,24(2): 365-371
赵磊, 赵新华, 王收军等. 柔性测量臂的RPY建模与误差标定[J]. 光学精密工程, 2016,24(2): 365-371 DOI： 10.3788/OPE.20162402.0365.

ZHAO Lei, ZHAO Xin-hua, WANG Shou-jun etc. RPY modeling and error calibration of flexible measuring arm[J]. Editorial Office of Optics and Precision Engineering, 2016,24(2): 365-371 DOI： 10.3788/OPE.20162402.0365.

摘要

为了提高1P3R型柔性测量臂的检测精度

提出了一种自适应误差标定方法来完成它的参数标定和误差补偿。首先

基于RPY理论建立柔性测量臂的运动学模型并应用微分法推导了误差模型。然后

基于马尔柯夫链收敛性理论进行实数编码;在遗传算法(GA)中引入自适应控制算子

提高了父代种群的多样性和最优个体变异数量;最后

对比分析了归一化GA、一般GA和最小二乘法等3种算法的误差标定精度及其收敛性

验证了所提出方法的有效性和可行性。结果显示:归一化GA仅用328代寻优计算

其精度达到5.2m

收敛速度是一般GA的2.3倍且精度提高了3.1m;最小二乘法经20次迭代计算后停止收敛

精度仅为18.4m。实验结果表明:归一化GA具有收敛速度快、标定精度高和收敛稳定性好等明显优势

更易于实现该类测量机的高精度检测。

Abstract

An adaptive error calibration method was proposed to complete parameter calibration and error compensation to realize the high accuracy test for a 1P3R flexible measuring arm. Firstly

a kinematic model of 1P3R flexible measuring arm was built based on RPY theory and a differential method was used to deduce the error model of system. Then

the real number encoding was performed based on the theory of Markova chain convergence. Adaptive control factors were added to Genetic Algorithm(GA) to improve population diversity and the quantity of the best individual. Finally

the calibration accuracy and convergence performance of a normalized GA

a general GA and least square method were compared and analyzed and the results were used to verify the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method. It shows that the accuracy of the normalized GA has been enhanced from 3.1m to 5.2m just after 328 generation searching

and its convergence velocity is 2.3 times that of the general GA. Moreover

the convergence of least square method is stopped after 20 generations and its calibration accuracy is only 18.4m. Experiments indicate that normalized GA is characterized by some advantages of fast convergence speed

high calibration accuracy and better stability. It is suitable for measuring these kinds of flexible measuring arms in high accuracy.

关键词

Keywords

references

张国雄. 三坐标测量机[M]. 天津大学出版社,1999. ZHANG G X. Coordinate Measuring Machine[M].Tianjin:Tianjin University Press, 1999.(in Chinese)

WEI L, WANG C J. Coordinate transformation and parametric calibration of multi-joint articulated coordinate measuring machine[J]. Opto-electronic Engineering,2007,34(5):57.

JORGE S, JUAN-JOS A, JOS A Y. Kinematic parameter estimation technique for calibration and repeatability improvement of articulated arm coordinate measuring machine[J]. Precision Engineering, 2008,32(4):251-268.

蔡自兴. 机器人学[M]. 北京:清华大学出版社,2000. CAI Z X. Robotics[M]. Beijing:Tsinhua University Press,2000(in Chinese).

SADJADIAN H,TAGHIRAD H D.Comparison of different methods for computing the forward kinematics of a redundant parallel manipulator[J].Journal of Intelligent and Robotic System,2005,44(3):225-246.

LI J, YU L D, SUN J Q, XIA H J. A kinematic model for parallel-joint coordinate measuring machine[J].Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics,2013,5(4):4-10.

XIAS G S,LIAO CH, FU Y J. Calibration and uncertainty evaluation of double parallel-joint coordinate measuring machine[J]. Opt. Precision Eng.,2014,22(5):1227-1234.

DENIS G, KRISHNASWAMY S. Adaptive Friction Compensation for Precision Machine Tool Drive[J]. Control Engineering,2004,12(11):1451-1464.

李松原,胡鹏浩. 并联坐标测量机的结构优化[J]. 光学精密工程.2013,21(11):2852-2859. LI S Y,HU P H. Structure optimization of parallel CMM[J]. Opt. Precision Eng., 2013,21(11):2852-2859.(in Chinese)

ROCHA C R,TONETTO C P,DIAS A. A comparison between the Denavit-Hartenberg and the screw-based methods used in kinematic modeling of robot manipulators[J].Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing,2011,27(4):723-728.

黄强先,余夫领,宫二敏,等. 零阿贝误差的纳米三坐标测量机工作台及误差分析[J]. 光学精密工程,2013,21(3):664-671. HUANG Q X,YU F L,GONG E M, et al.. Nano-CMM stage with zero Abbe error and its error analysis[J]. Opt. Precision Eng.,2013,21(3):664-671.(in Chinese)

浏览量

455

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

激光跟踪仪几何结构误差标定及修正