浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1. 中国科学院大学 北京,中国,100049
2. 中国科学院 长春光学精密机械与物理研究所 应用光学国家重点实验室,吉林 长春,130033
收稿日期:2015-07-20,
修回日期:2015-09-07,
纸质出版日期:2016-04-25
移动端阅览
王玉坤, 胡立发, 王冲冲等. 液晶自适应光学系统中倾斜镜的建模与控制[J]. 光学精密工程, 2016,24(4): 771-779
WANG Yu-kun, HU Li-fa, WANG Chong-chong etc. Modeling and control of Tip/Tilt Mirror in liquid crystal adaptive optical system[J]. Editorial Office of Optics and Precision Engineering, 2016,24(4): 771-779
王玉坤, 胡立发, 王冲冲等. 液晶自适应光学系统中倾斜镜的建模与控制[J]. 光学精密工程, 2016,24(4): 771-779 DOI: 10.3788/OPE.20162404.0771.
WANG Yu-kun, HU Li-fa, WANG Chong-chong etc. Modeling and control of Tip/Tilt Mirror in liquid crystal adaptive optical system[J]. Editorial Office of Optics and Precision Engineering, 2016,24(4): 771-779 DOI: 10.3788/OPE.20162404.0771.
为了提高液晶自适应光学系统的波前探测精度
研究了该系统中倾斜镜的校正方法。分析了液晶自适应光学系统中各环节的物理特性
利用拉格朗日方程给出了倾斜镜系统模型的基本结构;采用子空间辨识方法确定了模型参数
同时利用非线性最小二乘算法对子空间模型的频域特性进行了修正。修正后模型幅频特性均方根误差为0.0245 dB
相频特性均方根误差为1.9008°。引入Smith控制策略来解决倾斜镜校正波前整体倾斜过程中的时滞问题;利用子空间辨识出的模型分别进行Smith和PID的仿真和实验验证
得到的结果与仿真计算相吻合
即在相同稳定裕度的情况下
采用Smith补偿PID算法的误差抑制带宽比传统PID算法提高了23.97%。最后
用提出的方法对一组湍流整体倾斜信号进行了校正。结果显示:采用Smith补偿PID算法的控制精度比传统PID算法提高了21.03%
证实提出的方法优化了倾斜镜的校正精度
保证了开环液晶自适应光学系统的波前探测精度。
To improve the wavefront detection accuracy of a liquid crystal adaptive optical system
a correction method for the Tip/Tilt Mirror(TTM) in the liquid crystal adaptive optical system was researched. The physical characteristics of each ingredient in the adaptive optical system were analyzed
and the basic structure of the TTM model was given based on the Lagrange equation. Then
the model parameters were acquired by using modified subspace identification method
and the frequency domain characteristics of a subspace model were corrected by nonlinear least squares algorithm. After correction
the transfer function precisions are 0.024 5 dB for the amplitude and 1.900 8° for the phase in middle and low frequency domains. Furthermore
Smith predictor was introduced to solve the time delay problem during TTM correction. The model obtained by space identification was used in the simulation and experimental verification by Smith and PID. The experiment result is coincided with simulation result. It is shown that PID with the Smith predictor is superior to traditional PID
and the error residual bandwidth of Smith predictor is enhanced by 23.97% as compared with that of the traditional PID. Finally
a signal of turbulence Tip/Tilt was generated for a correction experiment
and the experimental result shows that the control precision of PID with Smith predictor is improved by 21.03% compared with that of traditional PID
which verifies that the proposed method optimizes the correction accuracy of the TTM and ensures the wavefront detection accuracy of the liquid crystal adaptive optical system.
TYSON R K. Introduction to Adaptive Optics[M]. SPIE Press, Bellingham, Washington, 2000.
CAO Z, MU Q, HU L, et al.. Optimal energy-splitting method for an openloop liquid crystal adaptive optics system[J]. Opt. Express, 2012, 17(20):19331-19342.
MU Q, CAO Z, HU L, et al.. Open loop adaptive optics testbed on 2.16 meter telescope with liquid crystal corrector[J]. Optics Communications, 2012, 285:896-899.
ZHANG X, HU L, CAO Z, et al.. Improve the accuracy of interaction matrix measurement for liquid-crystal adaptive optics systems[J]. Opt. Express, 2014, 12(22), 14221-14228.
DAO G M. Zernike annular polynomials and atmospheric turbulence[J]. Opt. Soc. Am., 2007, 24(1):139-155.
GANDINO E, GARIBALDI L, MARCHESIELLO S. Covariance-driven subspace identification:A complete input-output approach[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2013(26):377-391.
LIU T, SHAO C, WANG X Z.Consistency. Analysis of orthogonal projection based closed-loop subspace identification methods[C]. European Control Conference, 2013:149-155.
ALESSANDRO C, ENRICO M. Dynamic calibration of adaptive optics systems:A system identification approach[C]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2010, 3(18).
AXEL L H. Performance and Robustness of Smith Predictor Control and Comparison with PID-control[D]. Norwegian University of Science and Technology Department of Chemical Engineering, 2013.
GUIDO A, GIORGIO B, DANIELE M, et al.. Frequency based design of modal controllers for adaptive optics systems[J]. Opt. Express, 2012, 24(20):27108-27122.
WANG CH CH, HU L F, WANG Y K. Time delay compensation method for tip-tilt control in adaptive optics system[J]. Applied Optics, 2015(54):3383-3388.
JOHN Y, DAVID B, MARTIN F. The performance of the MROI fast tip-tilt correction system[J]. Proc. of SPIE, 2014:91461Z-1.
刘泊, 郭建英, 孙永全. 压电陶瓷微位移驱动器建模与控制[J]. 光学精密工程, 2013, 21(6):1503-1509. LIU B, GUO J Y, SUN Y Q. Modeling and control for PZT micro-displacement actuator[J].Opt. Precision Eng., 2013, 21(6):1503-1509. (in Chinese)
TYLER G A. Bandwidth consideration for tracking through turbulence[J]. J. Opt. Soc. A. m., 1994, 11(1):358-367.
LI X Y, JIANG W H, WANG C H. Power spectra analysis of the disturbed wave front in laser beam horizontal atmospheric propagation I:wavefront overall tilt and tyler frequency[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2000, 20, 883-889.
MICHEL V V. Filtering and System Identification:A Least Squares Approach[M]. Cambridge University Press, 2007, 111-112.
SERGE M, CYRIL P. Tip-tilt disturbance model identification for Kalman-based control scheme:application to XAO and ELT systems[J]. J. Opt. Soc. Am., 2010, 11(27):A122-A132.
丁科, 黄永梅, 马佳光, 等. 抑制光束抖动的快速反射镜复合控制[J]. 光学精密工程, 2011, 19(9):1991-1998. DING K, HUANG Y M, MA J G, et al.. Composite control of fast-steering-mirror for beam jitter[J].Opt. Precision Eng., 2011, 19(9):1991-1998. (in Chinese)
廖洪波, 范世珣, 黑墨, 等. 光电稳定平台伺服系统动力学建模与参数辨识[J]. 光学精密工程, 2015, 23(2):477-484. LIAO H B, FAN SH X, HEI M, et al.. Modeling and paramerter identification for electro-optical stabilized platform servo systems[J].Opt. Precision Eng., 2015, 23(2):477-484. (in Chinese)
朱明超, 刘慧, 张鑫, 等. 惯性稳定平台自适应前馈控制[J]. 光学精密工程, 2015, 23(1):141-148. ZHU M CH, LIU H, ZHANG X, et al.. Adaptive feed-forward control for inertially stabilized platform[J].Opt. Precision Eng., 2015, 23(1):141-148. (in Chinese)
赵建远, 李醒飞, 田凌子. 动力调谐陀螺仪子空间辨识[J]. 光学精密工程, 2015, 23(2):423-429. ZHAO J Y, LI X F, TIAN L Z. Subspace identification for dynamically tuned gyroscope[J]. Opt. Precision Eng., 2015, 23(2):423-429. (in Chinese).
0
浏览量
211
下载量
9
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构