浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.同济大学 航空航天与力学学院, 上海 200092
2.同济大学 先进微结构材料教育部重点实验室, 上海 200092
3.同济大学 物理科学与工程学院, 上海 200092
[ "贺鹏飞(1962-), 男, 陕西佳县人, 教授, 博士生导师, 1983年、1986年、1992年于西安交通大学分别获得学士、硕士、博士学位, 主要从事材料微结构力学性能表征和优化问题研究。E-mail:ph232@tongji.edu.cn" ]
戴瑛(1966-), 女, 江苏南通人, 教授, 博士生导师, 1988年、1991年于西安交通大学分别获得学士、硕士学位, 1995年于同济大学获得博士学位, 主要从事计算力学和结构数值仿真。E-mail:ydai@tongji.edu.cn DAI Ying, E-mail:ydai@tongji.edu.cn
收稿日期:2016-09-12,
录用日期:2016-11-17,
纸质出版日期:2017-05-25
移动端阅览
贺鹏飞, 尤佳伟, 戴瑛, 等. X射线聚焦望远镜镜片黏接装配的数值模拟和分析[J]. 光学 精密工程, 2017,25(5):1242-1249.
Peng-fei HE, Jia-wei YOU, Ying DAI, et al. Numerical simulation and analysis of X-ray focusing telescope in mounting process[J]. Optics and precision engineering, 2017, 25(5): 1242-1249.
贺鹏飞, 尤佳伟, 戴瑛, 等. X射线聚焦望远镜镜片黏接装配的数值模拟和分析[J]. 光学 精密工程, 2017,25(5):1242-1249. DOI: 10.3788/OPE.20172505.1242.
Peng-fei HE, Jia-wei YOU, Ying DAI, et al. Numerical simulation and analysis of X-ray focusing telescope in mounting process[J]. Optics and precision engineering, 2017, 25(5): 1242-1249. DOI: 10.3788/OPE.20172505.1242.
对采用圆锥嵌套Wolter-Ⅰ型结构的X射线聚焦望远镜在装配过程中产生的面形偏差进行了模拟和分析。首先,利用ANSYS有限元软件建立二维模型。然后,以实际装配步骤和夹具为加载和边界条件,通过分析不同半径镜片的装配过程,得到了面形偏差与三根压条的载荷关系曲线,由此优选出了不同半径镜片对应的最佳装配载荷。分析显示:除对应的最大面形偏差外,优选出的装配载荷均可控制在0.1
μ
m以内,满足装配精度要求,而且对应装配载荷下玻璃镜片的最大Mises应力也均小于玻璃的强度极限,不会在装配过程中失效。此外,建立了三维分析模型并与二维简化模型分析结果进行了比较。结果显示:计算偏差主要集中在镜片的前、后两端约5 mm范围内,最大偏差为2.3
μ
m;镜片中段两种模型的计算偏差小于0.03
μ
m,表明提出的二维简化模型可以用于玻璃镜片装配的快速面形偏差分析和载荷确定。文中对镜片装配过程的分析可为提高装配精度提供理论依据。
The surface errors in mounting process of a mirror used in the X-ray focusing telescope with a nested conical approximation Wolter-Ⅰ type structure was simulated and analyzed for an X-ray Timing and Polarization (XTP) satellite. Firstly
the 2-D finite element model was established based on ANSYS. Then
by taking the actual jig and mounting process as loading and boundary conditions
the curvilinear relationship between surface error and loading on three bars was obtained through the analysis of mounting process of the mirror with different radii and the optimized loadings according to different mirrors were selected. Analysis results show that the minimum surface error is less than 0.1
μ
m according to the optimized loading and satisfies the accuracy requirement. Moreover
the maximum stresses in the mirror are less than the ultimate strength of glass and maintain the reliability in mounting process. A 3-D model was established to compare with the 2-D model for deviation analysis. Results show that the main calculating deviation is 2.3
μ
m at front and back sections of the mirror in length about 5 mm. The calculating deviation at middle of mirror is less than 0.03
μ
m. The research show that the 2-D model could be used in the fast surface error analysis and loading confirmation. According to the analysis of mirror mounting process
the accurate mechanics analysis could provide academic bases and references for improving mounting accuracy.
SHEN Z X, WANG X Q, WANG K, et al .. Development of X-ray multilayer telescope optics for XTP mission[J]. SPIE , 2016, 9905:990520.
WEISSKOPF M C, TANANBAUM H D, VAN SPEYBROECK L P, et al .. Chandra X-ray observatory (CXO):overview[J]. SPIE , 2000, 4012:2-16.
ASCHENBACH B. In-orbit performance of the XMM-Newton X-ray telescopes:images and spectra[J]. SPIE , 2002, 4496:8-22.
MCCLELLAND R S, ROBINSON D W. Design concept for the international X-ray observatory flight mirror assembly[C]. IEEE Aerospace Proc. , 2009:1-8.
TANAKA Y, INOUE H, HOLT S S. The X-ray astronomy satellite ASCA(Initial Results from ASCA)[J]. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan , 1994, 46(3):L37-L41.
SHIBATA R, ISHIDA M, KUNIEDA H, et al .. X-ray telescope onboard Astro-E. Ⅱ. ground-based X-Ray characterization[J]. Applied Optics , 2001, 40(22):3762-3783.
BAVDAZ M, RANDO N, WILLE E, et al .. ESA-led ATHENA/IXO optics development status[J]. SPIE , 2011, 8147:81470C.
HAILEY C J, CHRISTENSEN F E, CRAIG W W, et al .. Overview of segmented glass optics development for the Constellation-X hard X-ray telescope[J]. SPIE , 2003, 4851:519-527.
JIMENEZ-GARATE M A, HAILEY C J, CRAIG W W, et al .. Thermal forming of glass microsheets for x-ray telescope mirror segments[J]. Applied Optics , 2003, 42(4):724-735.
KOGLIN J E, CHEN C M H, CHONKO J C, et al .. Hard X-ray optics:from HEFT to NuSTAR[J]. SPIE , 2004, 5488:856-867.
CRAIG W W, AN H J, BLAEDEL K L, et al .. Fabrication of the NuSTAR flight optics[J]. SPIE , 2011, 8147:81470H.
WANG Z S, SHEN Z X, MU B Z, et al .. Development of the X-ray timing and polarization telescope optics[J]. SPIE , 2014, 9144:91441E.
CHEN S H, MU B Z, MA S, et al .. Design of hard X-ray focusing telescope with a large field-of-view[J]. SPIE , 2014, 9272:92721R.
MU B Z, XIE Y C, CHEN SH, et al .. Tolerance analysis on nested conical Wolter-Ⅰ X-ray telescope[J]. SPIE , 2012, 8443:844340.
PETRE R, SERLEMITSOS P J. Conical imaging mirrors for high-speed X-ray telescopes[J]. Applied Optics , 1985, 24(12):1833-1837.
SERLEMITSOS P J. Conical foil X-ray mirrors:performance and projections[J]. Applied Optics , 1988, 27(8):1447-1452.
刘宏颖, 穆宝忠, 王占山. Wolter-Ⅰ型X射线天文望远镜的光学设计[J].光学仪器, 2012, 34(6):31-36.
LIU H Y, MU B Z, WANG Z S. Optical design of Wolter-Ⅰ X-ray astronomical telescope[J]. Optical Instruments , 2012, 34(6):31-36. (in Chinese)
GHIGO M, PROSERPIO L, BASSO S, et al .. Slumping technique for the manufacturing of a representative x-ray grazing incidence mirror module for future space missions[J]. SPIE , 2013, 8884:88841Q.
PETRE R, BREGMAN J, BAUTZ M, et al .. The NASA X-ray mission concepts study[J]. SPIE , 2012, 8443:84431I.
SMITH R K, BOOKBINDER J, GARCIA M, et al .. Science metrics for a NASA large optic X-ray microcalorimeter mission[J]. SPIE , 2012, 8443:84431J.
KOGLIN J E, AN H J, BLAEDEL K L, et al .. NuSTAR hard X-ray optics design and performance[J]. SPIE , 2009, 7437:74370C.
马顺翔, 王占山.用于柱面镜面形检测的CGH的设计与误差分析[J].光学仪器, 2015, 37(5):419-425.
MA S X, WANG Z S. Design and production error analysis of CGH for testing the cylinder surface[J]. Optical Instruments , 2015, 37(5):419-425. (in Chinese)
0
浏览量
397
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构