光学遥感卫星信息获取能力指数的评估

刘锋; 李琳

doi:10.3788/OPE.20172509.2454

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

光学遥感卫星信息获取能力指数的评估

信息科学 | 更新时间：2020-08-13

- 光学遥感卫星信息获取能力指数的评估
- Evaluation of information acquisition capability of optical remote sensing satellites
- 光学精密工程 2017年25卷第9期页码：2454-2460
- 作者机构：
  
  1.中国科学院国家空间科学中心, 北京 100190
  2.北京市遥感信息研究所, 北京 100192
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "刘锋(1974-), 男, 江西宜丰人, 研究员, 1996年、1999年于国防科学技术大学分别获得学士、硕士学位, 主要从事航天遥感系统总体设计、光学遥感质量仿真与分析及遥感卫星系统效能评估技术研究.E-mail:ericrs@126.com" ]
  [ "李琳(1977-), 女, 山东临沂人, 研究员, 2000年、2003年于解放军理工大学分别获得学士、硕士学位, 主要从事遥感卫星总体设计、星上图像处理与检测技术研究.E-mail:thisisll@sina.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金重点基金资助项目(9140A22020215JB08339)
- DOI：10.3788/OPE.20172509.2454
  中图分类号： TP751
- 收稿日期：2017-04-21，
  
  录用日期：2017-6-23，
  
  纸质出版日期：2017-09-25
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
刘锋, 李琳. 光学遥感卫星信息获取能力指数的评估[J]. 光学精密工程, 2017,25(9):2454-2460.

Feng LIU, Lin LI. Evaluation of information acquisition capability of optical remote sensing satellites[J]. Optics and precision engineering, 2017, 25(9): 2454-2460.
刘锋, 李琳. 光学遥感卫星信息获取能力指数的评估[J]. 光学精密工程, 2017,25(9):2454-2460. DOI： 10.3788/OPE.20172509.2454.

Feng LIU, Lin LI. Evaluation of information acquisition capability of optical remote sensing satellites[J]. Optics and precision engineering, 2017, 25(9): 2454-2460. DOI： 10.3788/OPE.20172509.2454.

摘要

提出了一种客观评估遥感卫星获取信息能力的指数模型。分析了影响遥感卫星信息获取能力的主要因素，包括运行轨道、成像分辨率、成像幅面、姿态机动能力等。以目标综合辨识量作为衡量标准，建立了涵盖成像分辨率、目标重访、姿态机动能力等要素的信息获取能力指数评价模型。介绍了模型的实现流程和具体步骤。该模型集成目标获取数量和目标获取精度两个维度信息，可实现遥感卫星信息获取能力的综合评估。以世界观测（Worldview）卫星系列、昴星团（Pleiades）和高景一号（Superview-1）等国内外光学遥感卫星为例进行了验证分析。结果表明，该指数模型能够对性能各异遥感卫星的信息获取能力做出准确评估，如WorldView-3的分辨率不到WorldView-1的分辨率的两倍，但信息获取能力却是其是3倍多；Superview-1分辨率比Pleiades高，但实际信息获取能力还不到后者的一半。得到的结果验证了提出模型的有效性，表明提出的模型可为综合评价光学遥感卫星遥感能力提供量化参考，为光学遥感手段的发展提供评估模型支持。

Abstract

A model for evaluation of the capability index of information acquisition in remote sensing was proposed. The main factors affecting the satellite remote sensing information acquisition ability

including orbit

imaging resolution

attitude maneuver ability were analyzed. By taking the comprehensive target identification as the standard

an evaluation model of ability index for the information acquisition which covers imaging resolution

target revisiting and attitude maneuver was established. The implementation process and the specific steps of the model were introduced. The model integrates two dimensions of target acquisition quantity and target acquisition precision

which could evaluate the practical physical significance comprehensively for remote sensing satellite information acquisition capability. With the Worldview series

Pleiades and a number of domestic and foreign optical remote sensing satellites as examples

the validity of the evaluation model was verified. The results show that the index model assess accurately the performance of different remote sensing satellites. It points out that the resolution of WorldView-3 is Less than twice as much as that of the WorldView-1

but its information acquisition capability is 3 times that of the WorldView-1. The resolution of Superview-1 is higher than that of the Pleiades

but its information acquisition capability is less than half of the latter. The validity of the evaluation model was verified

which demonstrates that evaluation model can provide a quantitative reference for the comprehensive evaluation of optical remote sensing satellites

and can provide a support for the evaluation of new optical remote sensing satellites.

关键词

Keywords

references

张绍华, 徐大龙.美国商业遥感卫星的发展[J].测绘与空间地理信息, 2016, 39(12):135-138.

ZHANG SH H, XU D L. The development of commercial remote sensing satellites in the United States[J]. Geomatics & Spatial Information Technology, 2016, 39(12):135-138. (in Chinese)

徐伟, 朴永杰.从Pleiades剖析新一代高性能小卫星技术发展[J].中国光学, 2013, 6(1):9-19.

XU W, PIAO Y J. Analysis of new generation high-performance small satellite technology based on the Pleiades [J]. Chinese Optics, 2013, 6(1):9-19. (in Chinese)

徐伟, 陈彦彤, 朴永杰, 等.基于吉林一号遥感图像的星载目标快速识别系统[J].光学精密工程, 2017, 25(1):255-262.

XU W, CHEN Y T, PIAO Y J, et al.. Target fast matching recognition of on-board system based on Jilin-1 satellite image [J]. Opt. Precision Eng., 2017, 25(1):255-262. (in Chinese)

范国伟, 常琳, 戴路, 等.敏捷卫星姿态机动的非线性模型预测控制[J].光学精密工程, 2015, 23(8):2318-2327.

FAN G W, CHANG L, DAI L, et al.. Nonlinear model predictive control of agile satellite attitude maneuver [J]. Opt. Precision Eng., 2015, 23(8):2318-2327. (in Chinese)

崔爽, 郭立红, 王伟国, 等.中低轨卫星高仰角时刻的轨道预测[J].光学精密工程, 2015, 23(1):245-251.

CUI SH, GUO L H, WANG W G, et al.. Orbit forecast of medium and low orbit satellite at the time of high elevation [J]. Opt. Precision Eng., 2015, 23(1):245-251. (in Chinese)

项磊, 杨新, 张扬, 等.基于层次分析法与模糊理论的卫星效能评估[J].计算机仿真, 2013, 30(2):55-61.

XIANG L, YANG X, ZHANG Y, et al.. Effectiveness evaluation for satellite system based on analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy theory [J]. Computer Simulation, 2013, 30(2):55-61. (in Chinese)

刘东坡, 费爱国, 李革. C 4 ISR系统信息优势度量研究[J].计算机仿真, 2007, 24(6):27-30.

LIU D P, FEI A G, LI G. Research on C 4 ISR information superiority measurement [J]. Computer Simulation, 2007, 24(6):27-30. (in Chinese)

钟季龙, 郭基联.空中远程作战体系效能评估的组合分析方法[J].系统工程, 2015, 33(11):140-145.

ZHONG J L, GUO J L. The portfolio-analysis methods for assessing effectiveness of system of long-range operation system [J]. Systems Engineering, 2015, 33(11):140-145. (in Chinese)

施慧杰, 顾浩, 杜阳华.海战场态势感知能力的度量方法研究[J].指挥控制与仿真, 2010, 32(3):28-31, 35.

SHI H J, GU H, DU Y H. Research on measurement of sea battlefield situation awareness [J]. Command Control & Simulation, 2010, 32(3):28-31, 35. (in Chinese)

邓冰. 遥感影像信息度量方法研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉大学, 2009: 23-41. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10486-1011071170.htm

DENG B. Research on remote sensing image information measurement method [D]. Wuhan:Wuhan University, 2009:23-41. (in Chinese)

沈宇飞, 王轶博, 矫贺明, 等.一类模糊评价模型与通信卫星效能评估[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2016, 48(4):129-132.

SHEN Y F, WANG Y B, JIAO H M, et al.. A class of fuzzy evaluation model and the effectiveness evaluation of telecommunication satellites [J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2016, 48(4):129-132. (in Chinese)

沈如松, 张育林.光学成像侦察卫星作战效能分析[J].火力与指挥控制, 2006, 31(1):16-20.

SHENG R S, ZHANG Y L. Analyses of operational effectiveness of optical imaging reconnaissance satellite [J]. Fire Control and Command Control, 2006, 31(1):16-20. (in Chinese)

王伟, 郑重, 李鹏飞, 等.面向任务的成像卫星传感器观测能力度量方法[J].武汉大学学报·信息科学版, 2013, 38(12):1480-1483, 1498.

WANG W, ZHENG ZH, LI P F, et al.. A mission oriented measuring method for imaging satellite sensors' observing capabilities [J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2013, 38(12):1480-1483, 1498. (in Chinese)

谢剑锋, 王鹏, 何川东, 等.基于证据推理的卫星遥感探测效能评估[J].四川兵工学报, 2015, 36(2):98-101.

XIE J F, WANG P, HE CH D, et al.. Effectiveness evaluation for satellite remote sensing detect based on evidential theory [J]. Journal of Sichuan Ordnance, 2015, 36(2):98-101. (in Chinese)

刘刚, 邹自力, 胡焰智, 等.指挥信息系统作战运用效能评估指导模式研究[J].兵工自动化, 2015, 34(7):65-70.

LIU G, ZOU Z L, HU Y ZH, et al.. Research on effectiveness evaluation guidance mode of operational application for command information system [J]. Ordnance Industry Automation, 2015, 34(7):65-70. (in Chinese)

浏览量

409

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

Lyot星冕仪光学系统及杂散光抑制

吉林一号宽幅01星宽幅相机在轨几何定标及精度验证

海水吸光度测量系统的搭建及误差来源分析

FY-3D星红外高光谱大气探测仪的在轨光谱精度评估

主动遥感探测海底可燃冰的正演研究